NV Energy Is a Monopoly—And That Shapes Everything

NV Energy—owned by Berkshire Hathaway—generates, transmits, and delivers your power. No competitors. Regulators set prices instead of markets.

Monopoly Utility One company with exclusive rights to serve a region, regulated by the state in exchange.

Build More, Earn More

NV Energy earns ~9–10% return on capital investments. Power plants, transmission lines, grid upgrades—each adds to the "rate base" that generates shareholder profit. The incentive: spend on infrastructure, not reduce your usage.

You Absorb All Fuel Risk. NV Energy Absorbs None.

Your bill has two parts. One is stable. The other can spike overnight.

Base Rates

Locked every 3 years. Covers infrastructure, labor, profit margin.

Your risk: Low

Fuel Costs

Passed to you quarterly, dollar-for-dollar. Gas prices spike, your bill follows. NV Energy absorbs nothing.

Your risk: 100%

2022: Gas Prices Jumped. You Paid.

Fuel costs rose ~70% in 2022, adding ~$15/month to average bills. Customers absorbed every dollar.

Six Actors. Six Conflicting Agendas.

🏢 NV Energy

Profits from capital spending. No stake in lowering your fuel costs or usage.

Profit-Driven

⚖️ PUCN (Regulators)

Balances rates against utility health. Risk-averse by design.

Public Interest

🏛️ Legislature

Responds to voter anger. Can override regulators when backlash builds.

Public Interest

🎰 Casinos & Big Users

Want lower, predictable costs. Some exit entirely—MGM paid $87M to leave.

Cost-Driven

☀️ Solar Industry

Needs favorable net metering to survive. Fights any credit cut or fee hike.

Market Share

👤 Residential Customers

Want affordable, reliable power. Solar and non-solar neighbors have diverging stakes.

Mixed

Four Trade-Offs With No Clean Solution

Climate vs Affordability

Nevada's 50% renewable target by 2030 requires billions in upfront capital. Rates rise now; savings come later. Low-income households feel it first.

Choice vs Cost-Sharing

When customers exit or go solar, grid costs don't shrink proportionally. Remaining customers cover the gap.

Central Grid vs Distributed

Rooftop solar improves resilience. But NV Energy only profits from infrastructure it owns—so it favors big plants over customer-sited solutions.

Innovation vs Stability

Regional markets and dynamic pricing offer efficiency gains but add uncertainty. Monopolies prefer predictability; policy is pushing change.

Public Pressure Reversed a Bad Decision

In 2015, NV Energy convinced regulators that solar owners weren't paying their "fair share." The PUCN slashed export credits and hiked fees. The solar market collapsed.

The 2015 Ruling Killed the Market

Fixed charges for solar customers jumped from $12.75 to $38.51. Payback periods became unviable. Tesla, Sunrun, and others fled the state.

Two years later, the Legislature reversed course. AB 405 restored credits, banned discriminatory fees. Applications surged 11-fold.

📉

Collapsed

Solar market after 2015. Major installers fled Nevada.

🚀

+1,100%

Applications the year after AB 405 passed.

The Data Proved Them Wrong

The PUCN later found net metering actually lowered average bills by ~$0.01/month when accounting for avoided grid costs. The "cost shift" claim was overstated.

Solar Bills Stay Flat. Everyone Else Rides the Spike.

Monthly Bills: Solar vs. Non-Solar

Solar homeowners stay flat year-round. Non-solar households absorb every fuel spike and AC surge.

☀️ Solar Homeowners

  • Credits locked at 75-95% of retail for 20 years
  • Insulated from fuel volatility
  • Protected from discriminatory fees
  • Requires ~$15-25K upfront (pre-incentives)

🏠 Non-Solar Households

  • 100% exposed to fuel pass-throughs
  • Benefit from utility-scale renewables long-term
  • May pay more per-customer as neighbors go solar
  • Low-income households hit hardest by volatility

Nevada Is Adjusting the Model—Not Replacing It

Enacted

Performance-Based Ratemaking

SB 300 (2019) ties profits to outcomes—reliability, clean energy—not just capital spending. Rules in development.

Enacted

Regional Grid by 2030

SB 448 (2021) mandates joining a Regional Transmission Organization. Off-ramps exist if it harms rates or reliability.

Proposed

Fuel Cost Sharing

Would require NV Energy to absorb 10-20% of fuel spikes. Gives the utility skin in the game.

Under Study

Decoupling

Breaks the link between profit and sales volume. Removes NV Energy's incentive to discourage conservation.

Enacted

Community Solar

AB 465 (2019) gives renters and low-income households solar access without owning panels.

Enacted

$100M EV Infrastructure

SB 448 funds statewide charging, 40% in underserved areas. Shifts transport costs to cheaper electricity.

Retail Choice Is Dead—For Now

Full deregulation was rejected by voters in 2018 after Berkshire Hathaway spent $63 million opposing it.

Key Takeaways

  • 1

    You can't switch providers—but you can influence regulation. The PUCN accepts public comments; legislators respond to constituent pressure.

  • 2

    NV Energy profits from building, not conserving. Performance-based rates and decoupling aim to fix this.

  • 3

    Fuel costs are 100% your risk. Solar adopters are insulated. Everyone else absorbs the swings.

  • 4

    The "cost shift" claim is overstated. The PUCN found rooftop solar slightly lowers average bills.

  • 5

    Public pressure works. The 2017 Solar Bill of Rights reversed a damaging decision. Berkshire Hathaway has deep pockets.

🔭 What to Watch

📋

2025 Southern Nevada Rate Case

NV Energy seeks base rate increases. Fixed charges hit low-usage and low-income households hardest.

Performance Metrics Development

PUCN is designing rules to tie profits to reliability and clean energy—not infrastructure volume.

🌐

Regional Grid Decision by 2030

Joining an RTO could unlock cheaper renewables. Staying out leaves Nevada isolated and higher-cost.

🔋

Net Metering Tier Thresholds

Current adopters get 75% credits. New capacity triggers could change terms for future installations.